Hillary Clinton is in Pakistan on her first visit since becoming US secretary of state.
She will meet senior officials on Wednesday as part of a three-day visit accompanied by Richard Holbrooke, the US special representative to Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Clinton's trip comes as the Pakistani military is involved in a nearly two-week long battle against members of Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) in the semi-autonomous tribal region of South Waziristan.
A number of issues will be discussed, including US drone strikes inside Pakistani territory, and an aid package that would give the country $7.5bn of US aid each year.
Last week, John Kerry, a US Democratic senator, held talks in the capital, Islamabad, in an attempt to counter protests over the aid package some officials said would “violate the country’s sovereignty".
Although the government defended the package, the military establishment expressed concerns about conditions that hinge some aid on efforts to battle suspected Taliban fighters.
The bill prevents the funding from being used for nuclear proliferation, to support fighters or to attack neighbouring countries, and calls for a cancellation of aid if efforts to crack down on pro-Taliban groups fail.
Anti-US sentiment
According to diplomatic sources, Clinton’s trip to Pakistan, billed by the Obama administration as one of her most important trips after assuming office, will concentrate on determining the causes of growing anti-Americanism in the country.
The government’s approval ratings are low, and analysts believe this is attributed to its relationship with the US.
| In depth | ||
|
|
Independent verification is all but impossible because the military has blocked access for journalists and humanitarian workers.
Since the assault began, the military claims to have killed at least 231 fighters, and lost 29 soldiers.
It has given no figures for civilian casualties, but those fleeing say many people caught in the middle were killed.
'Summary executions'
US military handling of the conflict in the region has also come under scrutiny, prompting the United Nations to call on it to demonstrate it is not randomly killing people during its pilotless drone attacks inside Pakistan.
 |
| The UN says more than 125,000 people have been displaced by the fighting [Reuters] |
Philip Alston, the UN Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial Executions, told a news conference in New York on Tuesday that drone strikes against suspected fighters in Afghanistan and Pakistan could be breaking international laws against summary executions.
"The problem with the United States is that it is making an increased use of drones/Predators [which are] particularly prominently used now in relation to Pakistan and Afghanistan," Alston said.
International law 'violated'
"My concern is that drones/Predators are being operated in a framework which may well violate international humanitarian law and international human rights law."
US strikes with remote-controlled aircraft against suspected al-Qaeda and Taliban targets in Afghanistan and northwestern Pakistan have often resulted in civilian deaths and drawn criticism from local populations.
"The onus is really on the United States government to reveal more about the ways in which it makes sure that arbitrary extrajudicial executions aren't in fact being carried out through the use of these weapons," Alston added.
He also urged the US to be more transparent about how and when it uses drone aircraft.
"We need the United States to be more up front and say, 'OK, we're willing to discuss some aspects of this programme,' otherwise you have the really problematic bottom line that the CIA is running a programme that is killing significant numbers of people and there is absolutely no accountability in terms of the relevant international
laws," Alston said.
Since August 2008, around 70 strikes by unmanned aircraft have killed at least 600 people in northwestern Pakistan.
0 komentar:
Posting Komentar